susamorg
02-28-2005, 08:15 PM
This kind of goes with the David Nichol's HQ Lameness thread but I didn't know whether to start a new thread or not...
I have a mare (WB/TB cross) that I suspect has a slight negative PA in the hind feet. She had been in NB shoes on the front for two years and then last year we put her in the NB hinds. The one thing I noticed was that she snubbed the toe that hangs over the shoe off worse than with the regular shoes fit to NB priniciples although she snubbed them off with those too.
She is currently barefoot now and has been since mid November and she hasn't dubbed the toe as badly barefoot. However, her foot appears to me to have a slight bullnosed appearance although not as extreme as the pictures Ron had in the other thread. She doesn't have any major resistances under saddle as far as leads or rein back but standing around in her paddock she just does not appear comfortable in the hind end. She almost is always resting one foot or the other and fairly frequently shifts her weight back and forth. She sometimes has some soreness in the SI joint. She has big fat frogs on all four feet but I suspect her to be the type that just has weak internal structures. Her conformation certainly doesn't help her being long, with a low set neck and slightly downhill :rolleyes: . She is primarily a pleasure horse be I do my training utilizing dressage exercises--nothing competitive. I will be getting her shod in a couple of week.
Is this a case where the breakover needs to be set back even farther?
I may try to get her in for radiographs which would definitively answer the angle question. My primary vet however is not an NB fan so I may have to change vets for these radiographs. I'm sticking with NB's. These are the first shoes to take care of the tripping issues up front secondary to her body balance. Thanks for your time.
Susan
I have a mare (WB/TB cross) that I suspect has a slight negative PA in the hind feet. She had been in NB shoes on the front for two years and then last year we put her in the NB hinds. The one thing I noticed was that she snubbed the toe that hangs over the shoe off worse than with the regular shoes fit to NB priniciples although she snubbed them off with those too.
She is currently barefoot now and has been since mid November and she hasn't dubbed the toe as badly barefoot. However, her foot appears to me to have a slight bullnosed appearance although not as extreme as the pictures Ron had in the other thread. She doesn't have any major resistances under saddle as far as leads or rein back but standing around in her paddock she just does not appear comfortable in the hind end. She almost is always resting one foot or the other and fairly frequently shifts her weight back and forth. She sometimes has some soreness in the SI joint. She has big fat frogs on all four feet but I suspect her to be the type that just has weak internal structures. Her conformation certainly doesn't help her being long, with a low set neck and slightly downhill :rolleyes: . She is primarily a pleasure horse be I do my training utilizing dressage exercises--nothing competitive. I will be getting her shod in a couple of week.
Is this a case where the breakover needs to be set back even farther?
I may try to get her in for radiographs which would definitively answer the angle question. My primary vet however is not an NB fan so I may have to change vets for these radiographs. I'm sticking with NB's. These are the first shoes to take care of the tripping issues up front secondary to her body balance. Thanks for your time.
Susan